Administrative Review Committees

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW COMMITTEES

Academic Senate Policy #S82-87

Principles

a. In keeping with the concept that
confidentiality is of primary importance, we recommend that the person
undergoing review not be allowed to select one member of his/her committee. Instead, that individual should be
allowed to consult with the President on the constituted membership of the
entire committee prior to the final decision. Such consultation would allow for adjustments, if necessary,
in balance and representation. (Modification
by the President, see below^*).

b. We recommend that the pool of
faculty names given to the President be twice as large as the number which will
serve on the review committee, and that the pool be constituted according to
the usual elections procedures of the unit involved.

Examples

a. School Deans and School Associate
Deans - “5 members drawn from within and outside school in question.”

b. Provost, Associate Provost for
Faculty Affairs, Associate Provost for Academic Programs, Dean of Graduate
Studies and Research, Dean of Undergraduate Studies, and Dean of Continuing
Education - “5 members from Academic Affairs and the
University-at-Large.”

c. Director of Library - “5
members drawn from within and outside Library.”

d. Associate Provost for Educational
Support Services - “5 members, University Faculty, Associated Students,
ESS, University Administrator.”

e. Vice President of Administration,
Comptroller, other administrators as designated - “5 members from within
and outside units involved.”

*** ACCEPTED BY PRESIDENT ROMBERG MARCH 16, 1982 ***