Minutes: March 3rd, 2009

ACADEMIC SENATE MEETING

MINUTES

TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 2009

SEVEN HILLS CONFERENCE CENTER, NOB

HILL ROOM

2:00 - 5:00 p.m.

ATTENDANCE:

Avani, Nathan

Jeung, Russell

Rehling, Lu

Boyle, Andrea

Jin, Leigh

Robertson, Bruce

Bugayong, Arlene

Kohn, Jim

Rosegard, Erik

Burke, Adam

Landry, Lynette

Rothman, Barry

Chen, Yu-Charn

Lau, Jenny

Salama, Mohammad

Chou, Fang-yu

LePage, Pamela

Shapiro, Jerald (abs

Dariotis, Wei Ming

Levy, Eileen

Sherwin, Paul

Davila, Brigitte

Li, Wen-Chao

Shrivastava, Vinay

DuVal, Derethia

Longmore, Paul

Sinha, Dipendra

Flatt, Sylvia

Luna, Debra

Taylor, Don

Goen-Salter, Sugie

McCarthy, Chris

Trautman, Ray

Gomes, Ricardo

McCracken, Bridget

Ulasewicz, Connie

Gubeladze, Joseph

Minami, Masahiko

Whalen, Shawn

Hellenga, Kate

Modirzadeh, Hafez

Yee, Darlene

Hellman, David

Neely, Francis

Holzman, Barbara

Noble, Nancy


Absences: Bartscher,

Patricia (exc); Chelberg, Gene (exc); Cheung, Yitwah (On Leave Spring 09);

Corrigan, Robert (exc); Danner,

Don (abs); Fuentes, Enrique (abs); Gemello, John (exc); Hussain, Mahmood (exc); Mahan, Dianne

(exc); Moody, Laura (exc); Morishita, Leroy (exc); Sheldon, James (abs); Sveinsdottir, Asta (exc); van Dam,

Mary Ann (exc)


Guests: Gail Evans, Helen Goldsmith, Wanda Lee, Joy

Viveros, Jo Volkert, Abdiel Oñate, James Martel

CALL TO ORDER: 2:15

p.m.


ANNOUNCEMENTS

· March

is Women’s History month. The 2009 theme is, “Women Taking the Lead to Save our

Planet.”

· College

elections for Academic Senate and university committee appointments will begin

in early March. Immediately following the announcements of the college election

results, the all-university elections will be held.

· The

referendum to approve an amendment to the Faculty Constitution, to enlarge the

senate body by two members and increase the staff representation to three

members, was approved. There were 224.28 appointment-time-based “yes” and 49.6

“no” votes recorded from the 297 faculty who voted.

AGENDA ITEM #1—Approval of the Agenda for March 3, 2009.

The agenda was approved.

AGENDA ITEM #2—Approval of the Minutes for February 17,

2009.

The minutes of the February 17, 2009, Academic Senate

meeting were approved as amended.

AGENDA ITEM #3— Report from Joy Viveros, Academic Honors

and Fellowships Advisor: Introduction of the SF State Fellowship Office.


Joy Viveros, Ph.D., Academic Honors and Fellowships Advisor,

Undergraduate Advising Center, was introduced to the Senate. She reported on

the SF State Fellowship Office and the services provided to both undergraduate

and graduate students.

AGENDA ITEM #4— Report from Statewide Academic Senators:

Andrea Boyle; Jerald Shapiro; and Darlene Yee-Melichar.

Academic Senate California State University (ASCSU) Senators

Andrea Boyle and Darlene Yee-Melichar reported on recent resolutions approved

by ASCSU, a resolution in first reading, current systemwide committee

activities, and systemwide updates.

AGENDA ITEM #5— Recommendation from the Faculty Affairs

Committee: Adding Journal Editing as Professional Achievement and Growth,

Second Reading.

Senator Levy, on behalf of Faculty Affairs Committee, moved

that the Senate approve a revision to the Retention, Tenure, & Promotion

Policy (#S07-241), that journal editing be added to the list of possible

exhibits of professional achievement and growth.

The motion passed.

AGENDA ITEM #6— Recommendation from the Executive

Committee: Proposed Reapportionment for Academic Senate representatives,

2009-2010 Academic Year, Second Reading.

Senator Trautman, on behalf of the Executive Committee, moved

that the Senate approve an Academic Senate reapportionment that includes 9

at-large members and additional members to each college as follows: Behavioral

& Social Sciences, 3; Business, 3; Creative Arts, 3; Education, 2; Ethnic

Studies, 1; Health & Human Services, 3; Humanities, 5; and Science &

Engineering, 4.

The motion passed.

AGENDA ITEM #7— Recommendation from the Curriculum Review

and Approval Committee: Proposed Revisions to the Minor in Latin American Area

Studies, First Reading

Senator Shrivastava, on behalf of the Curriculum Review and

Approval Committee, moved that the Senate approve revisions to the Minor in

Latin American Area Studies, including a change of the name of the minor to

“Latin American Studies.” Senator Shrivastava yielded the floor to Abdiel

Oñate, Professor, History, and Director of the Latin American Area Studies

program, who described the revisions.

Questions and comments included:

  • Why is

    the foreign language requirement changing from “intermediate level” to

    “basic” competency? How will the competency be demonstrated? The

    Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures could help develop

    instruments to assess foreign language competency.

  • Should

    the list of faculty teaching courses in the minor program be included in

    the proposal?

  • The

    foreign language requirements in several other minor programs offered by

    the College of Behavioral and Social Sciences were recently been reviewed

    by CRAC and the Academic Senate. Since the number of units in the minor is

    constrained, it is necessary to prioritize the desired requirements.

  • Foreign

    language is not “extra”; it is an integral part of the minor.

The speaker’s list was exhausted.

AGENDA ITEM #8— Recommendation from the Curriculum Review

and Approval Committee: Proposed Revisions to the M.A. in Political Science,

First Reading

Senator Shrivastava, on behalf of the Curriculum Review and

Approval Committee, moved that the Senate approve revisions to the M.A. in

Political Science. Senator Shrivastava yielded the floor to James Martel,

Associate Professor and Chair, Political Science, who described the revisions.

Questions and comments included:

  • Has

    the department considered alternatives to the GET or GRE to demonstrate

    entry-level writing proficiency?

  • The

    department might want to reconsider the two methods proposed for

    demonstrating exit-level writing proficiency.

  • The

    second purpose listed for PLSI 700 should be reworded (page 1, line 43).

The speaker’s list was exhausted.

AGENDA ITEM #9— Recommendation from the Student Affairs Committee:

Proposed Revisions to the Enrollment Management Committee Membership, First

Reading

Senator McCracken, on behalf of the Student Affairs

Committee, moved that the Senate approve revisions to Academic Senate Policy

#F02-222, Enrollment Management.

Questions and comments included:

  • The

    change in membership could change the committee composition from a

    majority of faculty to a majority of administrators.

  • Isn’t

    it better for the Vice President for Academic Affairs to appoint

    administrators to the committee, instead of listing specific

    administrative positions in the policy?

  • Who

    will call the first meeting?

  • Would

    the membership expansion cause the committee problems in reaching a

    quorum?

  • Could

    some members from administrative positions be specified as non-voting

    members?

  • Line

    33 should begin with a roman numeral “1” section identifier.

The speaker’s list was exhausted.

AGENDA ITEM #10— Recommendation from the Executive

Committee: Proposed Revisions to the Academic Search Policy, #S08-180, First

Reading.

Senator Rehling, on behalf of the Executive Committee, moved

that the Senate approve revisions to Academic Senate Policy #S08-180, Search

Committee for San Francisco State University Administrators.

Questions and comments included:

  • The

    specification of timely opportunity to review candidate information is

    appreciated.

  • Referring

    to item 4 on page 1 (lines 15-17) regarding the “unit” reporting to the

    search position, how will search committees for college deans be

    determined? The search committee for the dean of a college should

    specifically include department chairs, because chairs have specific,

    unique interactions with deans.

  • The

    specification of timely opportunity to review candidate information is

    appreciated.

  • The

    revision should be tabled until the search committee for a Provost / Vice

    President for Academic Affairs has concluded its task and reported to the

    Academic Senate..

  • Some

    revisions are desired now. For example, the current policy does not afford

    students the opportunity to serve on administrative search committees.

The speaker’s list was exhausted.

AGENDA ITEM #11— Recommendation from the Faculty Affairs

Committee: Proposed Revisions to the University Tenure and Promotion

Policy—Program Directors Ineligible to Serve on UTPC, First Reading.

Senator Levy, on behalf of Faculty Affairs Committee, moved

that the Senate approve a revision to the Retention, Tenure, & Promotion

Policy (#S07-241), such that program directors who have responsibility for RTP

review would be ineligible to serve on the University Tenure and Promotions

Committee.

Senator Levy moved that the item be moved to second reading.

The motion passed.

The main motion, now in second reading, passed.

Chair Whalen declared the meeting adjourned at 3:56 p.m.


Meeting Date (Archive)